And the Democrats Plan for Security Is....?
You'll find this op-ed by Fred Hiatt in the WaPost interesting. A rather hard hitting analysis of the Democrats plan for security. You'll find it quite...narrow:
Democrats Security Plan
It's easy to knock the Bush Admin. plan for security, but when it's time to put up, well, they might as well shut-up!
posted by Underground Logician @ 9:07 AM
11 comments
11 Comments:
Is there no one out there that's fit to lead this country???
If the dems were smart, they would say that Bush is right to a certain extent but that we need to look homeward and concentrate our efforts on security on our borders (where Bush is weak) and not overseas. When necessary, we will attack, but only when we see no alternative, yada yada yada. I'm not a political spin doctor anymore, but this is easy stuff!
Yup. Bush is weak on immigration. I get angry with him. He's way too much a North Americanist for me.
Be careful, UL, you may get DHG and CY coming on to your website and nailing you as a racist! Har-har! Those boys are sick in the mind and spirit. Really! What in God's name is the meaning of dear Daniel's photo? Misguided and Mislead, I say!
They can come. They are free but I'm not sure they will. DHG is pretty worn out and frustrated.
Why do you have to provoke me?
Why can't you just blog in your scape of things and I blog in mine and we don't make digs at one another?
Why is it that you have to make such digs again? You don't know me for Godsake, you have not the faintest knowledge of me but yet you deem to say I am worn out and tired?
When in fact all I've ever done is destroy all the propaganda you preach and the prejudice that colours your every word.
I made an agreement to stay away from your blog but you can't go and insult me and then expect me not to respond.
I notice you hover over Cranky's blog also? Please develop your ideology away from others, rather than swamping comments with your futile rants and defences of the Bush regime.
I shall make this very clear, either desist from making reference to me or I shall hunt down your ideas until there is not a shred of your arguement left.
As for Jasper: sick in the mind and spirit? You have no knowledge of me or understanding, yet you feel able to make such flawed judgements. And the picture is an image from a show I was in, is that better now?
DHG:
Digs? "Worn out and frustrated" is a dig?
Wow. You're one super-sensitive guy. As to destroying my arguments, uh, in your mind I suppose. I'm not too worried about you turning my arguments into shreds. You'd need to take logic to do that, and even then, I would be the better for it.
Go for it.
Oh I will.
DHG: you look like you're sick in the head in that picture, yet you publish it as if to be proud of it. You're just a strange little narssisist. You're a hateful fellow. Why do you persist in coming back? You are unwanted here, dear boy! But I suppose any attention you get (negative, obviously) is what you thrive from. Oh well, feel free to visit...
Jasper:
DGH is an actor, and it's a snapshot of one his plays. Drop it, will you!
I warned you in the post above, and I'll repeat it here. STAY ON TOPIC. You are deliberately picking a fight with DHG. I will dump your comments if you continue. Like I said above, start your own blog take it to your own house. This is your ONLY warning!
united against a common foe.
ROAR!
Post a Comment
<< Home