Friday, November 25, 2005

Liberals! Amazing Similarities Between Terrorists and Republicans!

If what you liberals say about Republicans is true, then you will hate terrorists so badly that you'll support the War in Iraq! Look for yourself at the top ten similarities between terrorists and Republicans: (drum roll please)

10. Both terrorists and Republicans kill innocent women and children, terrorists with their network of car and suicide bombers, the Repubs with a huge military network that hase the big bombs like MOAB, smart bombs, etc.

9. Both spread a message of lies and hatred.

8. Both have media in their hip-pockets; terrorists have Al-Jezeera...Repubs have talk radio.

7. Both want to create a theocracy; terrorists with Islam...Repubs with Christianity.

6. Both have oppressive systems of jurisprudence, terrorists have Sharia law, conservatives have the constitution.

5. Both groups oppress women; terrorists want women to wear burqas, Repubs want women home, barefoot and pregnant.

4. Both have leaders who look bad on T.V.; terrorists have a sickly Osama, Repubs...have Bush.

3. Strangely, Osama bin-Ladin and Richard Cheney each have 13 letters to their names.

2. Both are looking for WMD's.

And the number one similarity between terrorists and Republicans:

1. Bush has a pet dog and will do anything to eat Tex-Mex; Zarqawi loves to eat dog and will do anything to get to the Tex-Mex border.

Thursday, November 24, 2005

Happy Thanksgiving, Everyone!

There have been several thanksgiving holidays throughout the history of the U.S., beginning in New England soon after the pilgrims landed. Thanksgiving became a national holiday by executive order of Republican President Abraham Lincoln (If you recall, the Republican Lincoln is the one who freed the slaves with the emancipation proclamation, reversing the 'dreadful' Supreme Court decision Dredd Scott of 1857. Say it with me, Republican = freed slaves; say it again, it's easy!). Please read below a portion of his politically incorrect speech given during one of the darkest hours of our nation's history:

"No human counsel hath devised nor hath any mortal hand worked out these great things (the blessings of freedom and bounty). They are the gracious gifts of the Most High God, who, while dealing with us in anger for our sins, hath nevertheless remembered mercy."

"It has seemed to me fit and proper that they should be solemnly, reverently and gratefully acknowledged as with one heart and voice by the whole American people. I do therefore invite my fellow citizens in every part of the United States, and also those who are at sea and those who are sojourning in foreign lands, to set apart and observe the last Thursday of November next, as a day of Thanksgiving and Praise to our beneficent Father who dwelleth in the Heavens. And I recommend to them that while offering up the ascriptions justly due to Him for such singular deliverances and blessings, they do also, with humble penitence for our national perverseness and disobedience, commend to his tender care all those who have become widows, orphans, mourners or sufferers in the lamentable civil strife in which we are unavoidably engaged, and fervently implore the interposition of the Almighty Hand to heal the wounds of the nation and to restore it as soon as may be consistent with the Divine purposes to the full enjoyment of peace, harmony, tranquillity and Union. "
--Abraham Lincoln, October 3, 1863.

What greatness Lincoln possessed!

May God bless you today, on this national day of remembrance of His blessings. For those of you do not acknowledge the existence of God, we'll give thanks to Him in your place for you and ask that you have a wonderful and safe holiday weekend. But more than that, that you will someday experience the indescribable joy of knowing and loving God who loves us more than we can know or imagine. Call it our conspiracy of love to you!

Sunday, November 20, 2005

New Evidence of Iraq's WMD's!

New Documents Reveal Saddam Hid WMD's, Ties to Al-Qaida

Short account in Newsmax about the Weekly Standard's report of documents translated by U.S. Intelligence analysts. I wonder if this will hit the main liberal rags, NYTimes, LATimes, Boston Globe, etc. Maybe, but buried back on page 16.
Some main topics discovered about WMD's:

• Formulas and information about Iraq's Chemical Weapons Agents
• Locations of Weapons/Ammunition Storage (with map)
• Denial and Deception of WMD and Killing of POWs
• Ricin research and improvement

As to connections with Al-Qaida:

• Secret Meeting with Taliban Group Member and Iraqi Government (Nov. 2000)
• Document from Uday Hussein regarding Taliban activity
• Possible al Qaeda Terror Members in Iraq
• Iraqi Effort to Cooperate with Saudi Opposition Groups and Individuals
• Iraqi Intel report on Kurdish Activities: Mention of Kurdish Report on al Qaeda - reference to al Qaeda presence in Salman Pak

Once the documents are fully available in English, this ought to provide enough evidence to stop the stupidity that cloaks itself as liberal arguments against the Iraq War. Then they can all shut up, sit in the back seat, and let the grown-ups drive.

Monday, November 14, 2005

Who Is Really Lying?

Wall Street Journal Opinion: Who's Really Lying?

The quotes below come from Norman Podhoretz opinion in today's Wall Street Journal that came out this weekend on another news source. He step by step demolishes the idea that Bush falsely lead us into war in Iraq. Clearly logical, soundly backed with evidence, putting the blame on lying to America square on those who deserve to be outed, a few key Democrats.

On another more irritating note. Check this out!

Fox News Sunday Transcript of Senator Jay Rockefeller

I'd like to focus on this particular quote by Senator Rockefeller:

"I took a trip by myself in January of 2002 to Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Syria, and I told each of the heads of state that it was my view that George Bush had already made up his mind to go to war against Iraq, that that was a predetermined set course which had taken shape shortly after 9/11." Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-WV

What is infuriating is that this occurred prior to President Bush's final decision to invade Iraq. Who does he think he is, tipping the leaders of that region of our intentions? Is this not criminal, expecially with SYRIA"S connection to Saddam? It's time we raise hell about this! Is this not a seditious act by Senator Rockefeller? Is there anyone out there in blogland who understands the laws of sedition?

I'm so mad I could...I'm sorry, I can't go there.

Saturday, November 12, 2005

Still Another 'Guess Who Said This'

This time it's news organizations. Isn't this fun?

Quote #1 (oft repeated during Clinton Administration):

"without further outside intervention, Iraq should be able to rebuild weapons and missile plants within a year [and] future military attacks may be required to diminish the arsenal again."

Quote #3 (continuously repeated during Clinton Administration):

"hard to negotiate with a tyrant who has no intention of honoring his commitments and who sees nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons as his country’s salvation."

Quote #3 (upon George Bush's inauguration):

"[o]f all the booby traps left behind by the Clinton administration, none is more dangerous—or more urgent—than the situation in Iraq. Over the last year, Mr. Clinton and his team quietly avoided dealing with, or calling attention to, the almost complete unraveling of a decade’s efforts to isolate the regime of Saddam Hussein and prevent it from rebuilding its weapons of mass destruction. That leaves President Bush to confront a dismaying panorama in the Persian Gulf [where] intelligence photos . . . show the reconstruction of factories long suspected of producing chemical and biological weapons."

Once you guess who these are, you'll be able to see most clearly that the attacks against Bush are purely political and power grabbing, and most definitely, undermining the war effort, which is most definitely treasonous. Yes, I said treasonous. Bush is right to say that the efforts to smear him as a liar and fabricator of intelligence is precisely what it is, a revision of history. All liberals who have been involved should ashamed of themselves and should retreat into the private sector with their tails between their legs and should think twice about remaining liberal.

Another Guess Who Said This

I have three quotes from three different people. Here's a hint. They are all womyn.

Quote #1 (in 1998):
"Iraq is a long way from [the USA], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risk that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face. "

Quote #2 (in 1998):
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons-of-mass-destruction technology, which is a threat to countries in the region, and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."

Quote #2 (in 2002):
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical- and biological-weapons stock, his missile-delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al-Qaeda members."

Tuesday, November 08, 2005

Guess Who Said This

"The hard fact is that so long as Saddam remains in power, he threatens the well-being of his people, the peace of the region, the security of the world. The best way to end that threat once and for all is with the new Iraqi government, a government ready to live at peace with its neighbors, a government that respects the rights of its people.

If Saddam defies the world and we fail to respond, we will face a far greater threat in the future. Saddam will strike again at his neighbors; he will make war against his own people. And mark my words, he will develop weapons of mass destruction. He will deploy them, and he will use them."

Well put Mr. ...............!

Marine Stories Condemning U.S. Atrocities in Iraq Proven False

Is Jimmy Massey Telling the Truth? Uh, No.

Interesting story from the St. Louis Dispatch, is it not? Who knows what kind of damage has been done to military morale since Mr. Massey started blathering lies about so called atrocities. The morale could only have been damaged by willing participants in the media AND blog-world, I might add, who are so quick to condemn the U.S and unwilling to search for the truth. However, in an age of hate-Bush, it doesn't matter if it is true, it's the "seriousness of the charge" that is so distressing to all you hand-wringing liberals.

I wonder how much more lies and misinformation have been perpetrated by our media hounds?

Wednesday, November 02, 2005

Again, Knowledge is Not-Forgetting

U.S. Moves 500 Tons of Uranium in Iraq

Now that Joe Wilson has become the darling at Washington D.C. cocktail parties again, reported facts about Iraq's nuclear program seem to be forgotten. Such as the May 22, 2004 article in the NYTimes, a bastion of journalistic integrity for all liberals. Read it and judge for yourself; ask yourself where did Saddam get all this yellow cake? Hmmmm, Mr. Wilson? 1998? 1999?